How many of you spend more than half your workday doing Sarbanes-Oxley related tasks?

Dec 13, 2007 by Lemme guess | Posted in Corporations

And if you do not know what the Sarbanes-Oxley, you will. It seems that I spend more time ensuring that we are so consistent that to do anything these days!

I know what you mean, SOX is a royal pain in the a * s and is not really prevent anything from happening.

What are the chances that the government is going to discontinue the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?

Jul 15, 2007 by Mr. Main Event | Posted in Other - Business & Finance

Some of my friends are saying that the government is going to stop the Sarbanes-Oxley Act because it isn't business-friendly and it is costing companies a lot of money to do business in the US. Is this true?

There isn't a chance in HELL that SOX will get repealed. Any legislator that supports this is going to be painted as being in the pocket of the Enron's of the world bent on fleecing the american public. Such a politician would surely lose the next el

Sarbanes Oxley after the Dodd Frank Act - Sarbanes Oxley Updates

Sarbanes Oxley Ebook (276 pages), no registration needed. www.sarbanes-oxley-association .com Sarbanes Oxley after the Dodd Frank Act - Sarbanes ...

What May Be The Sarbanes-Oxley Act? (πωλουνται διαμερισματα).

by Bill Watters

hopfeed_link_font_color='#3300FF'. hopfeed_link_font_hover_color='#FF0033'. hopfeed_font_color='#000000'. hopfeed_border_color='#FFFFFF'. hopfeed_background_color='#FFFFFF'. hopfeed_font_size='13px'. hopfeed_font='Trebuchet, Verdana, Arial'. hopfeed_affiliate='server3'. hopfeed_link_target='_blank'. hopfeed_affiliate_tid='SECBCHASB'. hopfeed_path='http://server3. hopfeed_keywords='business'. hopfeed_cols=1.

Source: What May Be The Sarbanes-Oxley Act? (πωλουνται διαμερισματα).

SCOTUSblog » Provision of Sarbanes-Oxley unconstitutionally ...

by Kevin Russell

  Undue interference with that authority, the Court explains, undermines a central feature of our democracy – that the President shall be accountable to the people for the operation of the executive branch. 08-861), a five-Justice majority held that because the Board is overseen by the Securities and Exchange Commission, whose members are also removable only for cause, the Act unconstitutionally interfered with the President’s authority to oversee...   The Constitution gives the President the responsibility to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed.    However, in a disappointment to petitioners (an advocacy group and an accounting firm being investigated by the Board), the Court did not declare the Board itself unconstitutional.   As a result, the decision today is likely more important for what it portends in future cases than it is for its consequences for the parties in this particular litigation.   Instead, the Court simply excised the for-cause limitation on the Board members’ tenure....

Read more...